More on Nashville DUIs Under 21
These are serious penalties. The loss of one’s drivers’ license for a year places an incredible burden on those convicted. It can make day-to-day living much more difficult.
The offense of underage driving while impaired is a lesser-included offense of driving while intoxicated. In criminal law, a lesser included offense is a criminal offense that fits most of the elements of a more serious crime but is something that doesn’t carry the same gravity or weight as the higher offense. For example, simple possession of drugs is often a lesser included offense of a more serious drug distribution charge. To give another example, lesser included offenses of first-degree murder are second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.
Underage driving while impaired is similar to the bigger offense of driving while intoxicated, codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-401. The difference is that the BAC for driving while intoxicated is 0.08% percent, while the BAC for underage driving is only 0.02% percent. In more layman’s terms, it usually takes consumption of multiple alcoholic beverages for a person to be driving while intoxicated and have a BAC of 0.08% or more. However, it may take consumption of only one alcoholic drink for a person to cross the threshold of a BAC of only 0.02% or more.
In a real sense, this law thus subjects drivers who are 18 through 21 to more onerous restrictions than those drivers who are older than 21. In other words, the class of drivers who are in this age range (18 to 21) are treated much differently than drivers over the age of 21. One defendant who pled guilty to violating the underage driving while impaired law argued that the law violated the right of equal protection – that similarly situated individuals should be treated substantially the same. Both the United States Constitution and the Tennessee Constitution protect the right to equal protection of the laws.
The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals determined that the law should be subject to the highest form of judicial review – something known as strict scrutiny – because the law requires judges to impose public service and, thus, infringe on individuals’ personal liberty. Under the strict scrutiny standard of review, the government must justify that its law or regulation serves a compelling – or very strong – interest and be narrowly tailored.
However, the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals rejected an equal protection challenge to the law in State v. Crain, 972 S.W.2d 13 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). The appeals court explained:
We begin with the premise that it is unlawful for any person under twenty-one (21) years of age to even consume an alcoholic beverage. Tenn. Code Ann. § 1-3-113(b). If the consumption of alcoholic beverages can be treated differently for those under twenty-one (21) as compared to those twenty-one (21) years of age or older, then driving offenses relating to the consumption of alcoholic beverages based upon these age distinctions would seem appropriate. Clearly, the state has a compelling interest in maintaining the safety of our roads and protecting the public from younger drivers who have consumed alcoholic beverages. Furthermore, the statute is narrowly tailored to provide this sanction against younger drivers who are not allowed to consume alcoholic beverages, and who would present a danger to the public.
The key reasoning from the Court’s opinion is that the state has a “compelling interest” in “protecting the public from younger drivers who have consumed alcoholic beverages.” Note that a later Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals opinion stated that the CCA in Crain had applied the wrong constitutional standard – that it need not apply the high standard of strict scrutiny but perhaps could apply a lower standard, such as rational basis. But, the key point is that Tennessee courts have ruled the law constitutional.
Get Your DUI Defense Strategy
If you are charged with the crime of underage driving while impaired, you need a vigorous advocate and experienced criminal defense attorney to defend you. Philip Clark is not only an attorney experienced in criminal law but he also served as a police officer for more than twenty (20) years. He is uniquely qualified to provide quality representation to individuals facing underage driving charges. If you are charged with this crime, contact Mr. Clark at PNC Law.